Monday, January 31, 2005

Blog News Update 01/31/2005: Political Tickets 2008

I will devote todays date, which marks the end of January 2005, to a full speculation about 2008 now that January 2005 is officially over and the road to the 2008 Democratic Party and Republican Party nominations will be underway. We have to get through the 2005 and 2006 elections first, but to speculate on whom the Republicans will nominate and who the Democrats will nominate We must take time out of that and speculate. First of all, as i have posted before in a commentary here, I have noted that 2008 will be the first time since 1952 that an incumbent president nor an incumbent vice president will be seeking reelection. George W Bush will be at the end of his two full terms, and Richard B "Dick" Cheney , who has health and age problems, let alone doesnt want to succeed Bush regardless nonetheless, will also retire with Bush. Therefore, the last time this happened was in 1952, when an incumbent president (then Truman) and incumbent vice president (then Barkley) did not seek election. the Democratic Party that year nominated Illinois Governor Adlai E Stevenson II and he chose for his vice presidential running mate, John J Sparkman, and the rest is history. The Republican party that year nominated WW2 Hero Dwight D Eisenhower and he chose for his running mate, Then Senator Richard M Nixon. And the rest is history. The Republicans recaptured the White House for the first time in 24 years in apresidential election after 20 years of Democratic rule under FDR and Truman with vice presidents, John N Garner, Henry A Wallace , Harry S Truman, and Alben W Barkley. the Eisenhower-Nixon ticket won a landslide that year as the country was then comfortable with returning to Republican rule of and in the White House. Now, for 2008, Neither Bush nor Cheney is intending to seek reelection, and provided Cheney doesnt vacate the spot nor Bush by then to make way for a Republican, We will have a free openseat wide open contest for the Presidency for the first time since 1952. We might speculate alot of choices as to whom will run, but whom do you think will run? Give me your opinions in the blog today. Name the top Governors, Senators, or Representatives, as well as Celebrities or any other notable figures, that might want to seek the Presidency or thus be elevated to join the ticket for vice President with the Presidential candidates for both parties.

My picks that i would speculate for a Governor, Senator, and Representative or any other celebrity or notable figure will be speculated in the coming days after i see what my bloggers comment on.

More Blog News Tomorrow to begin February 2005!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

|

Sunday, January 30, 2005

Blog News Update 01/30/2005: Plus It Was Also The Collapse.....(continued from other saturday, january 29, 2005 01/29/2005 Blog News Update.)

News88 (Scots EEEIDO Members Blog)Extra Note From Yesterday's Blog On Social Security, with more to come on this and a wide variety of issues that i may have went on before and that i have not of went on before, but here is an extra note very short on Social Security from yesterday: "Plus it was also the collapse of the Stock Market why FDR created social security in the first place I may add and that is why he created it is a promise and a safety net. Get rid of it, we might as well take us back to 1929.

BioBlogs and BlogNews both coming soon!

More BlogNews Updates Tomorrow!

fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 Scot A Huss (New Blogger.)

|

Saturday, January 29, 2005

Blog News Update 01/29/2005: Day Off 5-Of-5

Yesterday's Blog Title: Gore-Bayh 2008.
Today's Blog Title: Not A Social Security Crisis, But A Reagan/Bush Deficit/Debt Crisis.

The Republicans are all out at it again, underminingSocial Security with every feat and might. But letstake a look at the facts shall we and then we willassume that Its they, not we, whos at to blame forthis. Look at the facts.1. Reagan and Bush 1 and Bush 2 has put America intodebt. From the FDR through Carter Administrations(even under Republicans) we kept the budget balancedin all of Social Security's life span.2. When Reagan came into office in 1981, He fed abunch of malarchy that we needed a huge military andarms buildup as well as his nuisant Star Wars Scheme(that Bush 2 is trying to bring back i may add) andfor his so called "War On Communism" He built up ahuge rack of American debt that future generations aregoing to have to pay.3. Clinton brought the budget back into balance, butnot for long, after the coup in 2000, Bush 2 wasinherited the throne (from his daddy and the buddieson the Supreme court appointed or promoted by his dadand a farce of the Mediaand Republicans nationally andin Florida) and boom, the Debt is through the roofagain.In 1996-1997, the year i focused onto politics in fullscale from the beginning, It was also the year that ihad been studying American History in my junior yearof high school. And my teacher that i had that yearfor American History admitted the inevitable that istrue: When Republicans come to power, they tend toborrow and spend so that future generations aresaddled with debt. And that is exactly why this is aBush/Reagan ala Reagan Bush debt crisis. Almost aRepublican deficit/debt crisis and not a SocialSecurity crisis.Thats what Republicans do with power. Screw the poorhelp the rich screw the middle class help the wealthyelites.Screw Social Security, Help CEOs saddle our money intothe stock market. Screw government, lets trust thestocks.

Alright, That is the BlogNews of the Day. Keep posted, for them bioblogs are on the way.

More Blog news of the Day tomorrow! :).

|

Friday, January 28, 2005

Blog News Update 01/28/2005: Day Off 4-Of-5

What does everyone here think of a Gore-Bayh ticket? Ivisit the occassional website set up by Chris DJackson and James Aquila and the staff of the Al GoreSupport Center and they discuss the inevitable that ibelieve is wholeheartedly true - THAT AL GORE IS THEDEMOCRATS ONLY HOPE FOR 2008. Read the 2008 strategyonhttp://www.algoresupportcenter.com/2008strategy.htmland It is remarkably, true. The only one that is ourhope in 2008 and the only one that will become thenext Democratic President is Al Gore. We should allunite behind Al Gore, and do everything we can to makesure he is the next president, but for sure to becomethe next President, that he starts a presidentialcampaign no earlier than after the 2006 midtermelections and no later than mid 2007 regardless of themidterm election results. The truth is, Democrats onlyhope is Al Gore just as the Republicans when they wereshut out of power in 1964 and came to their lowestdepth of denomination, They didnt do what we're tryingto do now. They fought Democrats and they won. Now wehave to do the same thing that the Republicans did inthe 1960s. We have to fight for every last vote in2006. And we have to fight for every last vote in2008. Remember, this. the Republicans gained 40 seatsin the 1966 midterms elections. And it set the stagefor 1968. If we fight for every last vote in 2006, Wewillgain ground bigtime in the House and the Senate,regardless if we can take back control or not, and wecan set the stage for noone else but Al Gore in 2008.Make sure that we convince Gore to return. He is ouronly hope for the Democratic Party. Noone else,especially Hillary Clinton, is going to be able towin. NOONE ELSE! We need tomake sure that Gore knowswe want him to return. As a progressive liberalleaninglibertarian Democrat myself, I actually would like tosay that only Gore is our hope. Gore inspired me tobelieve in politics at only 17 years old of age. Heinspired me to believe so much then that i made a goalto run for President myself (which is precisely whatmy nickname here means ala fpotusahuss20321979 =future president of the usa "huss" 2032 1979 the yeari would desire to run/the year i was born making me 53if indeed i run then and win ill become President Husswhich is why i put my last name in that.) But anyways,Gore inspired me to run for President. He had thatkind of impact. And hell, I didnt even think BillClinton and Al Gore would get reelected, though i knewit was a lock over Dole-Kemp in 1996, But i knew thatGore would be the nominee in 2000 and that he wouldwin big and huge. Now the scandal and all of thatClinton baggage may have costed Gore the election in aclose race, but he proved my point by winning Floridaand by winning the national election (despite losingbut albeit by only 4% his home state of TN). We needGore, for if he inspired me. Imagine who else then heinspired on any matter. And imagine eight years of aGore Presidency and what future teens he can inspireto take up politics. He can regain our faith in thesystem by making government more accountable to thepeople, and by streamlining government, etc. albeit etal. But anyways, The Al Gore Support Center has suchan interesting thesis, that instead of Gore choosingLieberman again, He should choose Evan Bayh as arunning mate. Evan Bayh is as credible as it gets. AlGore can appeal to both wings and is the only hope for2008. And Evan Bayh can appeal to swing votersnationwide. If they win every state that Clinton-Gorein their two bids carried, it will total to 403electoral votes versus only 135 for the Republicans.Then, throw in Evan Bayh on the ticket, plus theimpending war crisises in Iraq, And you can appeal toswing voters. He will be able to win a significientelectoral victory including probably Indiana, the homestate of Evan Bayh.It is a surefire must that i am going tostartsupporting http://news88.blogspot.com at my websitethere Al Gore and Evan Bayh as the Democratic Ticketfor 2008.Gore will appeal to the liberal and centrist bases,plus Evan Bayh thrown on the ticket for Veep will helpboth appeal to swing voters.

So, What do Yall think of my fourth day off of 5 blogs? Shall Gore come back in 2008 or not, and choose Bayh as a running mate or not? Give me your thoughts, even if they disagree or are counter to mine? Hey thats America right? Its a free country of thoughts and opinions.

More Blog News Updates Tomorrow! And the BioBlogs of my 30 members will be Coming Soon!

|

Thursday, January 27, 2005

Blog News Update 01/27/2005: Day Off 3-Of-5

No no updates today, and the bioblogs are being continued to work on by my members. But i must make a significient contribution to my blog news site today on the 27th that renders no less than the tributes i have so far received from a variety of sources. Anyways, on other news, Arnold Schwarzenegger really is taking it to the people now with a new plan to try to redistrict California in the middle of a decade. It is another rightwing power grab, and the people of California need to think fast for the right way of thinking. He cannot be able to get a majority of "moderates" in the California legislature to get his agenda passed, so hes willing to gut the California Constitution just like George W Bush and the National Republicans , as well as Texas Republicans, to redistrict in the middle of the decade to get the wielding of such power. Districts happen once every ten years after a Us Census.

In other news, I now officially endorse Chester "Chet" Culver for Governor of Iowa. He will be a significient leader in the fight for continueing Tom Vilsack's fiscally responsible policies in Iowa. Culver joins Marilyn Howard in my endorsement of her at News88, but this endorsement does not reflect my 30 members views, only my views. Governor Culver will bring to Iowa a new kind of Democratic culture, and he should be the one to succeed Tom Vilsack.

More Blog News Update Tomorrow! And i will have more on the Iowa Governors race come the 2006 election cycle starting next January as the primaries kick off in crucial states i will then give lengthy anaylises on each of the 2006 Governors races and each endorsement respectfully. However, There are states that i intend to endorse Republicans. So dont Republicans think that im only going to endorse Democrats because thats not going to be true. Yes so far im 2-0 endorsing Democrats with Culver in Iowa and Howard in Idaho, but yes indeedy do, I plan to endorse Republicans too.

More Blog News Update Tomorrow!

|

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Blog News Update 01/26/2005: Day Off 2-of-5

Sorry folks, no new updates today, as we are all still working on the bioblogs and a new format of how to do news, editorials, columns, commentaries, scripts, and blogs. But i do have one statement of news. Hilary Swank, Leonardo DiCaprio, and Jamie Foxx are looking pretty damn good on the cover of one of the three main newsweeklies this week onthe front cover. Stay tuned. They all have great nominations ahead of the Oscars. Also, related to politics, Michael Moore and Mel Gibson will hopefully win an Oscar or two with their nominations for F-911 and The Passion of the Christ.

One note of politics here: If you live in Idaho, please support Marilyn Howard, the states superintendent of public instruction (or the department of education by Idaho standards) for Governor. I think she would make a very interesting unique Governor for the people of Idaho. yes Idaho is a strong Republican state, but if Montana cando it with Brian Schweitzer, Please help Marilyn Howard in telling the Idaho Democratic Party (info@idaho-democrats.org) and tell them that you support Marilyn Howard, the Lone statewide elected Democrat currently in the current four year term (2002-2006) for Governor in 2006. Make sure the Democratic Party of Idaho endorses and nominates Marilyn Howard. She will be an exceptional outstanding Governor for the state of Idaho that current Republican Governor Dirk Kempthorne has left behind in his two terms, and she will lead this great state with exceptional power. Maybe the Republican bench is strong, but what can be stronger is our voice. In fact, I urge all Republicans inIdaho in considering this notion. Marilyn Howard and Idaho Democrats would probably be like Dave Freudenthal in Wyoming or Brian Schweitzer in Montana, andwould lead Idaho with substantial victorious agendas. Elect Marilyn Howard Governor in Idaho for 2006. Dirk Kempthorne is retiring and not seeking another third four year term (Idaho currently doesnt have term limits) and it could be substantial to see a Governor Howard in Idaho come 2006-2007.

Write to the state Democrats in Idaho , linked above, and tell them to nominate her. She has already won twice statewide in her bids for the post she holds now (see above) and surely will be an exceptional candidate.

New Blogger fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 double nicknamed online.

p.s. I will give a full anaylsis on Governors races in the country, and this one in Idaho, during the 2006 Election Season Campaign underway next year, even before the Primary there and the General in November 2006. Source: http://news88.blogspot.com and Other Source: http://www.idaho-democrats.org . Third and Final Source: http://www.sde.state.id.us/ for more information on Marilyn Howard and her current role as well as probably a biography of her.

|

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Blog News Update 01/25/2005: Day Off 1-Of-5

Hi, My members are in the process of fixing up BioBlogs, as well as i myself. We will get them published online as soon as possible.....so please be patient and dont mind the wait. There will be no other news updates or anything here today, so once again we apologize. But my members are in the process of getting a Personal Life and Professional Life BioBlog filled out in the computer and internet lab. They sign online during different times of the week, in the lab here, and do not all come to the lab at once. All or most however do live in our apartment complex, and will get the updates to me as soon as possible or can be made readily available. For now i leave you with that, and be patient, stay tuned and we will get the bioblogs online asap or when readily made available.

New Blogger fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 double nicknamed online.

p.s. If you have any comments, questions, or suggestions that you would like to request for my site, Please feel free to email me at scottieboy19791998@hotmail.com as you are always welcome to give your thoughts about how i can improve my daily news, editorials, columns, blogs, commentaries , or scripts. I probably am going to take a day or two off from the lab or such so i will not get to publish anything but Open Threads for Comments for a couple of days or so. But we will get those bioblogs online asap, and we will get up the site running efficiently after that. Be Patient.....as i have only started and am trying to keep up with things in the Usa or the world. For now i leave you with Google News and Yahoo news links. Cya later. :).
http://news.google.com

http://news.yahoo.com

|

Monday, January 24, 2005

Blog News Update 01/24/2005: Farewell To Former Late Night Tv Host Johnny Carson And To My Teacher/Counselor Mr A J Carlson

Goodbye Mr A J Carlson!
Goodbyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee,
Johnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnny!

I have to admit something here on my blognews site. I was going to start a week, or 9 days consecutive, of giving bios of all of my 30 members (2 short descriptions in 2 paragraph forms that is based on bios of their personal life and professional life) so that my users can get a chance to know about them a little bit (including myself) before i begin having blognews, editorials, columns, and blogs as well as commentaries and scripts written by them that i will post myself here for them. But, at the last moment as i was going to publish my latest news and stuff today, two deaths shocked me greatly. The death of national superstar, and king of late night, Johnny Carson, who died Sunday at his home. 1925-2005. he was 79. From Yahoo News! - http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20050124/ap_on_en_tv/obit_carson

From Google News - http://news.com.com/Net+mourns+death+of+Johnny+Carson/2100-1026_3-5546915.html c/o CNET.

Also, Johnny Carson was a legend. A late night tv superstar, who succeeded to Jay Leno, He was taken into our homes and hearts for 30 years. Sadly he will be missed. In the words of Johnny Carson, Goodbyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, Johnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnny, We will surely miss you.

Now, for another death, that isnt as big. But as i was preparing to do my blogs for Sunday, I had found out that not only did my Grandfather on my fathers side pass away about a week ago, but that just Thursday, One of my teachers, who was also my counselor, or one of them for 4 years, from 1994-1998 when i was in high school. passed away at 51. 1954-2005. born Jan. 12. died Jan. 20. I must admit, when i got the time, I wanted to see him once more in life, but my life had been quite busy for quite some time since i graduated high school in 1998 and i never got the chance. I was quite shy in high school, and never did talk much to him, and i was wanting to make that up to him when i was hoping to get the time to see him again. Now hes gone, and never did i get that chance. This reminds me, and hopefully probably all of you, that in life, If you have someone special (whether it be a spouse, friend, colleague, teacher or professer from high school/college, etc.) that made an impact on your life, or atleast the part of your life you had them in like me, You should always make time for them. Life is just too short and if we dont hold dear what is in or within our hearts to make time for someone special no matter who they are, They will be gone forever. So with this blog, in addition to honoring Johnny Carson, I am honoring that teacher/counselor of mine who passed away at only age 51. I will honor him too here in my blog nonetheless regardless. Goodbye Mr Carlson, and even if i did not get one last chance since my high school years/days to see you , I still hold you into a place in my life for bringing me up in a special way during a shy time of my life and for making me believe again that it is not calm to be afraid of everything in the World and to not be as shy and calm.

More Blog News Tomorrow!

p.s. But remember life is short, so make time for a friend, teacher/counselor, family member, friend, etc whatever today. Make sure you let them know what they meant , if any had an impact, on your life. It can be anyone. Just please make time for someone special in your life! Life is just too short, and just too precious, to waste away without letting know someone special how much you deeply care for them and/or how much they made an impact on your life again as well too.

|

Goodbye, Mr. A J Carlson: 1954-2005

Here is the link to my local newspaper, The Register-Mail, website once again.

http://www.register-mail.com

***Header Note: And here now is the article once again for Joseph Carlson:

Joseph Carlson

January 22, 2005

BERWICK -<0x00a0>Joseph Carlson, 51, rural Berwick, died at 8:30 a.m. Thursday (Jan. 20, 2005) in Warren County.

He was born Jan. 12, 1954, in Galesburg, the son of Arthur and Roberta Shaw Carlson.

He married Joni Jackson in 1973 in Knoxville.

Surviving are his wife; two sons, Justin of St. Charles, Mo., and Jeremy at home; a daughter, Julia at home; a brother, Max (and Lidia) in Texas; and a stepbrother, Bob Shaw. He was preceded in death by his parents.

He graduated from ROVA School in 1972 and earned his master's degree in special education from Western Illinois University.<0x00a0>He was working on his master's degree in administration at the university.

He lived near Berwick the past seven years and before that in Abingdon.

He worked as a behavior management consultant for many of the western Illinois school districts.

He was of Methodist faith.

The family will receive friends from 5 to 8 p.m. Monday in Hinchliff-Pearson-West Abingdon chapel, with a prayer service at 8 p.m. by the Rev. Paul Dinges.<0x00a0>Cremation will be accorded following the service.

Memorials may be made to an education fund for his children at Tompkins State Bank in Abingdon.

FOOTER NOTE: Even though i knew you for four years in high school, and a brief visit to the high school at the end of 8th grade, and i didnt get to see you once again as i had promised myself i was, I will still always remember the impact in high school that you had on my life to help me believe again, Mr Carlson. You will surely be missed by me! 1954-2005. RIP, and God Bless You! Sincerely, new blogger Scot A Huss aka fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979.





There will be more Blog News tomorrow, and i will promise short personal life and professional life bios of my 30 members soon before i begin January 30, 2005 or atleast February 1, 2005 on the normal routine iwill make this site with 1 blog a day. Take care for now everyone! :-)

|

Sunday, January 23, 2005

Sunday BlogNews 01/23/2005: Check Google And Yahoo

no blog news or anything for today, sorry folks, but i do have to mention that beginning January 30, 2005 , I and my 29 co-member workers that will contribute to my News88 site with news, editorials, columns, blogs, or even commentaries and scripts, will begin writing 1 blog a day by a different one of my members, Probably in the order of the 30 of us. which means each of us will probably get to contribute atleast once every 30 days. That gives for each of us to contribute approximately, or about, once a month, to my blog site. I just also had to add that we will contribute these in format period only.

Anyways, soon i will be adding Google News and/or Yahoo News Headlines to the website here.

New Blogger fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 Scot A Huss

p.s. but there is no news or anything for today as it is a quiet time for me here at the internet computer lab trying to figure out some new routines for the site. If you have any, feel free to email them to me at Email Me

|

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Saturday Blog Special 01/22/2005: We need a democratic congress in 2006

With the decay in America almost at full bloom, I must go to say that i really much thank the starter of it all, George W Bush and Richard B "Dick" Cheney. I guess it just somehow does not matter to the people of these United States of America that the country is on the road to fiscal catastrophe, yet all they can do is politicize social issues to turn out their "conservative, or shall i call it religious or so-called religious conservative base" so that they will continue to rule the country with open arms, and with no formal opposition. America has almost always been a two party system, but we are dangerously becoming a one party state. I was shocked and dismayed at an article at Google News last night, as well as Yahoo news, that said that Bush may have to cut back on Medicaid spending, despite opposition from governors in both parties that they dont want the strain of Medicaid being saddled to only just them back in the states, and despite the fact that we are spending billions to secure and make safe a country that probably will never be able to be as safe and secure as it possibly can be. I find it amusing that Bush would call for cuts in social programs back here at home, while vowing that every last dollar needs to be spent "securing Iraq." If, anything, the unrest has likely occurred to me that this country is officially in full decay and bloom. If you trade your own people for a peoples that really does not matter to the free world, because they in all of almost human history have never lived under a real free world democracy like ourselves, then what do we have here? What do we have here? It could not possibly occur to me that we are accomplishing what we think or what we may try to accomplish, and Iraq is becoming nothing more than a quagmire like Vietnam every day. I hope for the best on the January 30, 2005 elections there, but is it a real possibility that they really will elect a stable democracy there? This is a part of the world that in all of human history has never really had a stable democracy. I think scaling back programs and services here at home to the American People because we are going broke is completely disastrous and completely insane. The governors, both democratic and republican, do not want to be saddled into raising state and local taxes because they have to be saddled right with the responsibility of cleaning up for the deficits left at the federal level by George W Bush. His policies are in no way that of a true conservative, nor are they that progressive. There has to be fiscal accountability and we are spending more in Iraq than that of our own peoples. How can we really secure the safety and peace of the Iraqis, when they livein a part of the World that has never seen the daylight of Democracy, and unless George W Bush can prove his point in his second term to lead a Trumanesque type revolution, probably never will in the forseeable future. America should not have gotten into this quagmire, as if Saddam was really a bad guy compared to the state that could possibly emerge under an Islamic fascist. Saddam probably was more Pro-America compared to what could possibly emerge under an Islamic fascist. That is pretty damn bad huh? Well, lets just take a look at the state of the federal budget deficit, and the state of the Quagmire, which i myself will keep penning it as from here on out (regardless of future editorials and news by my members opinions starting January 30th , 2005) and believe me, It just is not worth it to think that we will ever accomplish the goods. I hope maybe 40 years from now the people will look back to President Bush and say that he did the right thing and that Iraq turned intoa stable democracy, then he will be remembered kindly and favorable like Truman. But i see this as becoming nothing more than a Quagmire right now, and we are costing the lives of our men and women in uniform. Now, back to the state of the country, our country is at a crossroads. We can either continue down the path of destruction in both our economic and international affairs, while we let the Republicans jinx up their "religious conservative" base at the polls to keep voting for the kind of mess, or we can put into effect a real agenda that will benefit the American People, but will benefit the World, without driving us into debt/deficits. We cannot afford a Republican Congress anymore that is letting George W Bush get away with this because their corporate media minion friends and allies in Congress want to see us down the path of rightwing extremism. The agenda i see here is not coming from a true fiscal conservative. It is coming from nothing more than a radical neo-conservative rightie that is imbalanced. Now, we can either stay that path, or we can elect A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS in 2006. We need a democratic congress in 2006. This country cannot afford the debt/deficit destruction that George W Bush has put us on. This makes Ronald Reagans true fiscal conservatism look like a democrat progressive, for that is how bad it is. Ronald Reagan was just as bad at balancing a budget, and by harboring the WAR ON COMMUNISM which drove us into debt/deficit that Clinton had to bring back into balance. But we need a Democratic Congress, because the Republican Congress so far has shown no interest (not even the ones that question Bush's agenda on his side of the aisle especially) in vetoing the policies that are going to cost our nations children and grandchildren. What will the taxes be like in the future for all of this for our 18 year old, or our 13 year old, or our 3 yearold? Or what will our taxes be like for the ones in the womb? I guess that will get the RightWing enchanting, because they so envy life in the womb while not envying life from birth to old age. But we can put fiscal conservatism, and progressivism, back into our common sense policies if we get people in the Congress that will change the way this Congress does things. In fact, i make it my goal here today, that all who is smart, would turn out a huge mandate in 2006, not just in the November general election set for November 7th 2006, but also to turn out the vote in Democratic primaries and Republican primaries. Oust your incumbent representatives with others that may appear on the ballot. If we get people in Washington DC on both sides of the aisle that is not part of this environment, they will begin to question this environment's policies (even Republicans, and even Republicans that are conservative.) We need to be bold, smart, and make this a true democracy in the 2006 Election. Oust all of your incumbents, in primaries and in generals, and make sure we get a true democracy going. Or atleast oust your incumbent, dem or rep, if they voted for the fiscal irresponsible policies of the Bush administration. The one way to know what they are doing is to check their local representative and state Us Senate websites. Now, as i leave you, I must say that if we get to work, We can elect a Democratic Congress to counter these policies in 2006. George W Bush must sometime suffer the fate of his Dad, and it must be in 2006. That way for the remaining 2 years of his term, he will deal with the opposition. If Clinton had to deal with the opposition for 6 years of his 8 years, then we have to make sure that we make George W Bush accountable for his actions in Iraq, and fiscal economic policy, by ousting our incumbent representatives and senators that votedfor his nonsense neo-conservatism. This is not true conservativism. This is neo-conservatism. and in a later future editorial i will give to you what it means to be a true conservative, and a true progressive, and in some cases , both. For now i leave you at this, We need to hold George W Bush accountable in 2006. Elect a Democratic Congress. Make sure in your local representative race, or us senate race, that you elect a Democratic member (incumbent or challenger representative or senator).

Another BlogNews Update Tomorrow!

|

Friday, January 21, 2005

Tell The Democratic National Committee Now! Dean For DNC; Gore For 2008 NOW!

News88 (Scots EEEIDO Members Blog)FRIDAY BLOG SPECIAL 01/21/2005:

Dean For DNC; Gore For 2008! Listen Folks. Heres the deal. If the Democrats truly are the smartest party in the World, and no doubt they are, even when stood up against the Republicans, And we are the Oldest party in the World, for no other party affiliate in the World has survived as long as us, not even the Republicans themselves. If we truly are the oldest party in the World, and we have the oldest and newest values combined to the World, and the right values , of the World, then Howard Dean will be sworn in as the next DNC Chairman for the next 4 years (ala FEB 2005 to FEB 2009.) Howard Dean is the perfect, most perfect, man for the job. He has energized grassroots all over this country. He gets the people inspired on a message of taking back this country for the people who built it. We need Dean to become the DNC Chairman. The corporate special interests and the DC insider lobbyists, and especially the corporate and dc pollsters and pundits, must NOT have their way this time. We must take back the Democratic Party and that is with Howard Dean as the DNC Chairman. Yes, Howard Dean has said that he most certainly will not run for President in 2008 if he is chosen as Chairman because he wont have the time to mount a presidential campaign as Chairman in 2008's Election, and plus the term is from February 2005 to February 2009 going right through the Campaign. But this is where Al Gore comes in here.............

.............Al Gore has the passion, the heart, the soul, the energy, the dedication to the grassroots and the people above the special interests of corporations and the dc lobbyists and pollsters and pundits, to rise to the challenge of another presidential campaign. He should energize himself directly after the midterm 2006 elections this time, regardless if the Republicans retain Congress in one or both of the chambers of the House of Representatives and Senate, or if the Democrats pick up Congress in both or one of the chambers of the House of Representatives and the Senate. And Al Gore should get the Democratic Party nomination in 2008. Gore is the next Democratic President, and we may never see another Democratic president in theWhite House, atleast for the foreseeable future, but probably not at all, unless Al Gore is there first for two full terms. Al Gore must become the 44th President of the United States of America in 2008 (and possibly 2012 too.) This is a good strategy as he was supposed to be #43, and #44 has a nice ring to his name even more than #43. Al Gore's life has been in eight year intervals, atleast with his public life and career in government. He served eight long years in the House of Representatives representing his home district in the state of Tennessee (1977-1985; elected in 76, 78, 80, and 82) , He served eight long years in the Senate minus a failed 1988 bid for President in the Democratic Party primary/caucus season (1985-1993; elected 1984 reelected 1990. resigned 1/3 of the way through his second term to become Bill Clintons choice for Vice President and got elected Vice President of the Usa under Bill Clinton as President), 8 years as VP under President Bill Clintons leadership from 1993-2001 (elected and reelected in 1992 and 1996 to that) and won the popular vote for President in 2000 but retired after the Supreme Court Coup De Tat that gave George W Bush the Presidency elected in 2000 for the Republicans. Thats 24 years from age 28 to 36 to 44 to 52. Then, While George W Bush was President for 8 years and two full terms, Al Gore retired but stayed close to politics speaking out on behalf of Democrats and Democratic candidates, as well as the Democratic message , for democratic activists and also worked for private media firms, public universities, including venturing into starting his own cable tv network or buying out a current one to counter the current media with a new media. That he did, almost posthumously, from 2001-2009 while George W Bush served out his two elected terms as President for the Republican Party. Eight years of that as a private citizen while (SIC) President George W Bush was in the White House for the Republicans and Republican Party (2001-2009) even after Kerry-Edwards failed bid to be President and Vice President in 2004 while Al Gore went from age 52 to 60 and can pave his way, provided he will return in 2008, he can return to The White House as his future home and head for there from the ages of 60 to 68 for 8 years. Al Gore 2009-2017 (elected 2008, 2012 reelected.) Its a sure thing. Its who the Democratic Party and the Democrats need. We need Al Gore to return in 2008. But, like Nixon in 1968 for the Republican Party and the Republicans, He should MOST CERTAINLY NOT choose his former running mate for the veep (vice presidential spot) again for the 47th Vice President of the Usa to follow Cheney two full terms 2001-2009. Lieberman has moved further to the Right/Conservative base as a Democrat then anyone or anything in that party. (even betraying Democrats by considering being Bush's homeland security secretary, even though he ultimately turned it down to stay in the Us Senate where he is a senator from the state of Connecticut.) Lieberman has betrayed the Democratic Party and our core values. We must not let Gore choose him again. Lieberman is decent personally as a man , but professionally and politically in hisviews, he isnt. In fact i have said many times that Gore should choose John Edwards, but even Edwards is a softie. But if all due respect, Lieberman Kerry and Edwards should be omitted. And also but if all due respect, even ina big Republican year in the South, Governor Mike Easley (of North Carolina - state) bucked the trends of past 1 term southern democratic governors in other southern states, and won reelection to a second term in 2004 (2000 was his first, and NC has a 2 term consecutive limit.) And he did that in North Carolina as a Governor to a second full term in office. Maybe someone like Mike Easley would be the choice for Gore for Veep. Easley has focused on jobs, healthcare, and education as Governor. Those are core Democratic Party issues. Easley may be from the South, but he should be known as a core Democratic Party constituency , and depending on how he handles his second term as Governor, Easley, born in 1950 and two years younger than Gore (1948) might be a perfect choice for Vice President. Like Nixon, who chose Maryland Governor Spiro T Agnew and not Senator Henry Cabot Lodge Jr who had been his runningmate in 1960, Gore would be perfect to mount a southern strategy and pick up a few western states, and more of the Midwest as well as the rest of the country that him andKerry won in states nearly idential and equal to each other and one another, and by keeping everything that Democrats usually do win big and huge in (swing states or democratic states) like Illinois and the Upper Midwest, the Pacific West and the Northeast 12 from Maine to DC, then we will win big and huge in a landslide, or atleast somewhat some kind of a rout, all 12, in the next election in 2008.

GORE-EASLEY 2008. you've heard it here first!

*****Extra note here: - Another option though, would still be Indiana Senator Evan Bayh for a Gore-Bayh ticket.


p.s. And that is also the point now here of Howard Dean becoming the next DNC Chairman to serve from Feb 2005 to Feb 2009. The fact here is, and now to focus on 2005 and 2006, Howard Dean will vow to fight for the progressive democratic cause of socially liberal fiscally conservative progressive values over the next four years, and he will start the day he is sworn in. He will fight to make sure we keep local, state , and federal offices crucial to our chances come by 2008, in every election from Day 1. I bet one of the first elections are for Los Angeles Mayor, and i believe James K Hahn is running for reelection if he chooses to or if hes not termlimited, but regardless if it is an open seat race nonetheless, well, that is the point of making Dean the permanent DNC Chairman for the next four year term from FeB 2005 to FEB 2009. He will energize us from the ground up, and we will win those 2005 elections, alot of them; and we will win in 2006 for crucial House, Senate, and Governor races (incumbents or challengers in any of the three categories.) Howard Dean is the only one that will be a proven fundraiser and give the Democratic Party an effective voice and message, to make sure we keep stuff we hold now, as well as pick up stuff that the Republicans hold, maybe not all, but most or some to somewhat, And he will do that from Day 1 on a Progressive Democratic Message of social liberalism andfiscal conservatism. He is the progressive leader we all need for the Democratic Party in the wake of the stunning terrible losses of 2004 that really toppled 2002 by a widespread dignity for the House Senate and The White House. Please urge that Howard Dean, be the next DNC Chairman, write to your local and state democrats, and write the the national democrats at dnc@democrats.org. Tell them only Howard Dean for the next Chairmanship job to succeed Terry McAuliffe for the Feb 2001 to Feb 2005 term, for the Feb 2005 to Feb 2009 term. Then, we can pave the way for the return of Al Gore in 2008. with either Evan Bayh or Mike Easley, joining him on the ticket. Thanks. And that is my endorsement!

Note - My news88 team has endorsed the democratic ticket of Bill Richardson and Evan Bayh. But this is my individual endorsement, though i voted with the other 29 by a majority for Richardson/Bayh with a Yes vote for my website endorsement within my internet department but that is my endorsement as a group with them. My personal interested endorsement is Dean for DNC; Gore for 2008 with Bayh or Easley for Veep. Possibly even Rep. Lane Evans (D-IL17th District) for Veep.

There will be another Blog News Update tomorrow!

|

Thursday, January 20, 2005

Extra News For 01/20/2005: January 2005 Birthdays Of My Members

As many of you all know from the very first blog article i made on my debut date and day, I am doing this on behalf of myself and 30 of us members (7 of which are group leaders of 6 groups) and we are putting up my internet department office as News88 online, a news media and political site (but for other uses too which will be specified later) resource for hands on opinions in commentaries and scripts, as well as news, editorials, columns , and blogs that will be of significient resource. The material here though is not endorsed by all of us as a whole, and will be written by myself. However, at times in the future, they will contribute, mainly beginning February 1 2005 when i settle into my daily one a day postings of blog news articles. They will contribute beginning January 30, 2005. And frequently they will have an article related to them themselves, and they may not all be related to news media and politics. however, because February 2005 will be the beginning of that all, I am going to post all of my 30 members of us that have January 2005 birthdays right now here in this article whether the date is past, present or future. Keep track of us here at this site, and by the end of 2005, we will have completed all of us going through a cycle of birthdays. Make our site your homepage, or put us into Favorites by pressing CTRL + D.

Now, I will close out this blog news article with the birthdays here of my January birthday members in January 2005 only:
1. Jennifer1982 (aka fflotusahuss20321982, mistress1982) turns 23 January 1, 2005. Mail to jalrismistress1982@hotmail.com (currently active) and mistress2000isjalr@www.com (currently inactive).
2. Craig1982 (craig1982) turns 23 January 10, 2005. Mail unavailable. Sorry.
3. Randall1956 (powersunshine1956) turns 49 January 20, 2005. Mail to randallbirmingham56@hotmail.com.

Those are the three January 2005 birthdays. Happy Birthday to those three members of mine! For further reference, My members wont always be listed like by month. I will wish them a happy birthday in my daily blogs beginning in February 2005 with the February 2005 birthdays of those members, uniquely on each of the days that they are celebrating a birthday. Take care and Enjoy, and more blog news tomorrow!

Blogger fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 double nicknamed online Scot A Huss.

|

Thursday Blog Special 01/20/2005: U. S. Presidential And Vice Presidential Inauguration Day 2005

Check out my new articles on Abortion and Gay Marriage. I will update and put more articles as i can make them available on both subjects, as well as other issues, which probably will next be on either Guns or Affirmative Action. But as i close now, There will be no editorials for January 20, 2005 to mark Inauguration Day and as no blog news to mark the death of my grandfather in a more tribute in a day of silence here on these blogs since i had messed it up yesterday. Anyways for now, My users can check out Buzzflash.com's latest 20th of 20 consecutive editorials leading up to the George W Bush Inauguration Coronation to his second full term in office at this link, and ill see you again tomorrow for another daily editorial.

http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/05/01/edi05022.html

P.S. More Blog News Of The Day Tomorrow. From here on out, I will begin doing my blogs once a day whether it would be news, editorials, columns, or blogs that will be commentaries or short scripts that will from here on out be doing two articles a day through February 1st. And after that just one thing will be published daily (including not excluding weekends) after that. I am trying to mark time though here, and thats why i am trying to cover every day in January 2005 so my blog, even if it debuted January 15, 2005 at the start of the third fiscal week of 2005of seven days, can still be able to cover every date/day of the previous two weeks. So thats why i will either double, or in some cases triple, the number of blogs i post here on a given day for the rest of January 2005. i will settle into a daily blog after that. For now, Ill talk soon and take care. :)

Blogger fpotusahuss20321979/mister1979 Scot Huss

p.s.s. As promised, my girlfriend was unavailable to fill in for me, but what i had to do got cancelled so i am here as usual. She will eventually post a feature soon though.

|

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Extra News For Wednesday Blog News

Tomorrow, after my blog is done observing my grandfathers death in remembrance, We will return to normal daily news from around the world and around the country when George W Bush and Richard B "Dick" Cheney are sworn in to their second terms as the 43rd President of the United States of America and the 46th Vice President of The United States Of America. Their first term lasted from January 20, 2001 to January 20, 2005 , whereby by their second term will or should last from January 20, 2005 to January 20, 2009. In 2008, as many of you all probably will know already, Both Bush and Cheney are expected to probably retire together leaving the presidency and vice presidency wide open on both sides of the aisle for the Democrats and the Republicans in the United States Of America to actually get a chance to nominate two brand new tickets (May the Best ticket Win?) to begin a new fresh start for America and the World. It will be the first time since 1952 that the presidency will not be filled in by a candidate on either party ballot that will actually be an incumbent president or incumbent vice president. Truman and Barkley (both democrats themselves; bush-cheney are both republicans) were the last time this happened then in 1952. It should be a pretty interesting primary/caucus season for both sides in 2007 and 2008, as well as general election prospects in the fall for the November 2008 Election. We here in my IDOEEE at News88 wish Bush-Cheney well whether we (i and my 29 co-member workers) agree or disagree with their policies. As for 2008, My blog team here at this blog address stands behind Richardson/Bayh for the Democrats regardless if that is the Democratic ticket, just we stand behind that prospective choice nonetheless regardless if they actually run, win, or both, et al etc.... . And of course to make this fair and balanced, We, or I , will endorse a Republican choice ticket of mine by or at July 2005 on this blog site address here of mine as promised before in previous blogs.

Also, On January 19th 2005, This is the birthdate or the birthday rather of one of my favorite actresses when i was a child, and one of my favorite tv crushes. Jodie Leanne Sweetin, who played Stephanie Judith Tanner, the middle child/daughter on the tv series on ABC Full House, will be turning 23. See http://www.sweetin.com . That address again should be http://www.sweetin.com .

Tomorrow, I will be letting my duties be taken over by my girlfriend, Lindsay Taylor, who will post under my nickname but will specify in all caps lock keys that it is her posting. She also knows about the last paragraph i just wrote directly in this post. But that happens to be a tv crush. Im sure everyone here can feel free to comment about any tv crushes or any tv favorite actors, actresses, and shows too.

Until then, back to observing my grandfathers death. And take care. Lindsay1986 will be filling in for me tomorrow.

|

We Hardly Knew Ye et. al.

We Hardly Knew Ye et. al.
RIP 1918-2005

courtesy of http://www.register-mail.com and The Register-Mail, Galesburg, IL, Usa.

Deaths Section January 18, 2005 issue.

Lloyd D. Huss Sr.

January 18, 2005

MONMOUTH - Lloyd D. Huss Sr., 86, Monmouth, died at 11:34 p.m. Sunday (Jan. 16, 2005) in OSF St. Mary Medical Center, Galesburg.
He was born Dec. 7, 1918, in Oquawka, the son of Cecil W. and Leora V. Sebring Huss.
He married Almeda M. Dobson on April 27, 1940, in Burlington, Iowa. She died Nov. 9, 1985. He then married Clarissa H. Self on July 12, 1986, in Burlington, Iowa. She died July 20, 2004.
Surviving are four sons, Harold (and Julie) Huss, Freeport, Lloyd D. Huss Jr., Carman, and Raymond (and Carol) Huss and Richard (and Mary) Huss, both of Dallas City; two daughters, Judy (and Fred) Krabbe, Kansas City, Mo., and Lela (and Larry) Worley, Carman; one brother, Charles Huss, Carman; one sister, Sylvia Gillispie, Burlington, Iowa; and many grandchildren and great-grandchildren. He was preceded in death by his parents, one grandchild, one great-grandchild and one brother.

He was reared in Oquawka, where he attended school.
He began working at the Button Factories in Keithsburg and Oquawka and later as a mechanic for City Bus Lines in Burlington. He also did some produce farming and open air marketing with his father in the Oquawka area. He also worked at Witte Paint in Burlington where he was a foreman, and then was employed as an offset pressman for Kellogg Printing in Monmouth. His last employment was at Admiral Corporation, retiring in 1980.


Funeral will be at 2 p.m. Thursday at Turnbull Funeral Home, Oquawka, with the Rev. Robert Adams officiating. Friends may call Thursday at the funeral home; family will be present from noon to 2 p.m. Burial will be in the Oquawka Cemetery.

***And i might add as one says in a final chapter of a life of someone special. Goodbye, We love you, and Well Miss you. God Bless.

|

Wednesday Blog News 01/19/2005

I have to take time out for the Blog News today, as i just found out that my 86 year old grandfather on my father's side (Dad's Dad) passed away on Sunday. Today will be a day of rest in this blog in honor of him and his life. I myself did not get much of a chance to know him, as my parents were divorced and i lived practicially on my mother's side, but he still holds dear in my heart as a member of my family, and therefore it is polite to honor his legacy for a day here on my blogs.

May God Bless my grandfather, Lloyd D Huss SR.
1918-2005.
Rest In Peace with my heartfelt love, respect, and condolences.

In Honor of My Grandfather's passing away, I will have a day of silence. For now feel free to stay with the next article below and read a clipping from the http://www.register-mail.com website, the website of our local Galesburg, IL, Usa daily newspaper, on his passing. Goodbye, So Long, and Farewell, Grandpa, We'll miss you.

|

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Gay Marriage: A Republicans Best Friend

Well apparently noone has been as deadfast here as i was at the site of the 2004 campaign site of GeorgeWBush.com. And of course the favorite counterpart of Democrats, the RNC.org. Anyways, before i get into that, I must say how relevant Republicans are to shift the focus onto the issue of Gay Marriage during the 2004 campaign and election season that they had 11 states put anti-gay marriage platforms on the ballot. And yet, let them 11 states approve the gay marriage platforms on election day when a swarm of your anti-gay evangelicals hit to the polls in those 11 states. Its like anti-gay evangelicals get to have the final say as to what happened in America on November 2, 2004, after four years of job losses, economy tanking, two wars (1 illegal even by the UN, even after they declared there were no WMDs and Saddam probably only posed a threat to his own people and not to the world; For dont get me wrong, I am against evil dictators harboring on this planet, particularily in positions of power where they can screw us all up.) After four years of job losses though, as well as an economy tanking, the sinking dollar and middle class, corporate corruption, wrongful trade and immigration policies that are wrecking our country and filling the United States Of America with cheap corporate labor instead of a hard earned dollar labor, factories shutting down all over America since the beginning of Bush 1 and Clinton, but forgoing the conclusion under Bush 2 by a wide interpretation, 1000 soldiers (at the time of the election) killed in Iraq, What do the Republicans run on? Yes, they ran their platform on Gay Marriage! Hmmm. I guess they didnt wantto turn their attention away from that because if they did, Bush 2 would have become a 1 term president just like his Daddy. And whos to blame for anything of the other that is happening in our God-Rest country since 1995 when the GOP took control of Congress and 2001 when they had full control of the Government again after their unrest easy election coup in 2000. I guess we only can run on Gay Marriage in 2004, to ban gay marriage against a sector of our society that is just fighting for the same equal rights that every other group has fought for all through enternity. Fighting against maniac conservatives that want to turn back the clock on Civil Rights, Women's Rights, Gay Rights, Disability Rights, because they would rather appreciate living in our country in the year 1000 than the year 2000. Make that 2000 BC instead of 2000 AD. I guess Republicans really do owe alot to the Gay Marriage issue that they "won" this election by a 3% margin. Despite ignoring the overwhelming evidence that Democrats took back alot of state and local offices that will put us in a strong position for the future. No, Im not siding with Howard Dean you pathetic RightWingers that may come to my site and say that. Im just siding with the truth. I do support Howard Dean. I mean he has the fiscal conservative socially liberal progressive ideas that matter to our country. He balanced budgets in Vermont, kept the environment in his home state clean and conserved treasures that are rich with beauty and didnt plunder them, and he stood up for a sector of society that were fighting for their rights when he signed the Civil Unions into law in his state in 1999-2000. But thats not the point. The point of this all is is not who i supported for President and who anyone supports for President, but a president regardless of party or ideology should not stand in the way of Human Rights around the Globe and definitely not in our country that is trying to spread Human Rights and Democracy around the Globe by using ours as a model. I find this irritating that the GOP can use the Gay Marriage plank, because that is all they had to run on in 2004. They had nothing to run on in 2000. They had nothing to run on in 2004. Let me just be honest with you. I am against gay marriage, for i believe that a man and a woman union is sacred. But i am in support of giving human rights to a sector of society, and if that sector demands that they have the full accountability then they too should be able to have human rights. I believe it to be our duty to not side with rightwing evangelical extremists (the bulk of the turnout that lifted George W Bush to a second full term in office so we have four more years of him) and we should demand that even gay people live in a free society. Our founding fathers divorced us from the kings and queens of Britain because they wanted accountability. They wanted us to be free. Now in them days they may have forgotten the colored man, and their own women folk, and probably didnt even think about gays. But the truth is, they left it in our Constitution that we as a people could update our Constitution when necessary, as long as we protect the basic human rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. I believe it to be our duty to protect the basic human rights enshrined into the Constitution, and conserve them like a conservative (a true conservative that is) , but i also find it to be our duty to fight for the rights of others that may want the same freedom and liberty that we all want in America. And that is why i was against the GOP platform in 2004. it was wrong, immoral, and degrading to DISCRIMINATE against less than 10% of our population by wanting an outright ban on Gay Marriage. I hope George W Bush is proud of himself, and i sure hope Cheney is too as he has a lesbian daughter that he envies as a daughter, but wont fight for human rights by standing against, not for, George W Bush's discriminatory policy. I myself am not gay but i support gay rights. even marriage. I dont support it as a union between a man and a woman, but as basic human rights that we must all be compassionate, inclusive, and diverse about. If indeed it is very relevant to let the GOP do something like this and divide our country against less than 10% of our population, that is downright WRONG! Gay people deserve every last right of freedom and liberty that our great country has to offer, and let this be my goal - The GOP now stands for GREED OVER PLENTY. anyways, the 2004 GOP platform is in my own words degrading, discriminatory, and dirty. If they show their true colors like that, then maybe they shouldeventually be put out of power for good. And someday im sure they will, but maybe not for good, just for a long time until they learn how to be diverse, inclusive and compassionate. It is alright to be against gay marriage, but to use the issue to divide our country and to use the issue to discriminate against less than 10% of our population is wrong. I know that true traditional conservative republicans, moderate republicans, and the rest of us would like the extreme radical right to be lifted out of the Republican Party. I will give more on this later too, but for now i leave it at these words. If indeed less than 10% of the population is gay, and alot that are gay even if we legalized gay marriage nationally (which i myself am against because it should be decided by states), or if we gave civil unions nationally (which i myself am for and i support because civil unions are not gay marriage for they are just basic human rights that for example, a gay would be able to see a loved one in the hospital or get equal pay on the job, etc to a straight.), Then why is it and How is it that Gay Marriage being legal will change the definition of marriage (that of between a man and a woman?) . Think about that one.!

fpotusahuss20321979-mister1979 double nicknamed online Scot

p.s. I happen to be straight. I am currently in a relationship with a girl 7 years younger than me, and i am in some rocky times with her right now, but i am straight and always will be. For all of you rightwingers that come to my site to dismiss the whole GOP gay marriage platform as "acceptable tolerant and right", let me ask this? WHY?

|

Tuesday Blog News 01/18/2005

Im not one to not make my webpage fair and balanced, so as an endorsement of Bill Richardson and Evan Bayh as the Democratic ticket in 2008 I will indeed say that in the coming months, even though i myself am a democrat, I will endorse a Republican ticket for 2008. Most likely it will be the same credentials as a Democratic ticket, ala a Governor and a Senator in that order. I dont care what happens for 2008, nor do i know what will happen by 2008. The democrats have alot of straightening up to do after their defeat in 2004 for the House, Senate, and the White House. So therefore, I am one to keep this fair and balanced while still expressing my heartfelt mind on opinions and stuff. I will endorse my version ofa Republican ticket in the coming months. So if your a political junkie that follows political sites no matter how partisan or non partisan, ideological or non ideological, or even religious or non religious, Keep tuned. I will make it a very interesting Republican pair. I believe with my full heartfelt opinion though as a democrat, that i would give my version of an endorsement for that party first. However, this blog site will from this point further, stand by Richardson/Bayh as a democratic ticket for 2008 no matter what happens. Now, If Al gore did get into the ring, I could probably withdraw my considerable opinion of Richardson and give my endorsement for Gore. But if that is unlikely, Bill Richardson remains my favorite as i believe that, like the Republicans in 2000 and the Democrats in 1988, that when your out of the White House for eight years, You should nominate a Governor, whether they win or lose. Senators just cannot make that case. And that is where i firmly chose the most credible democratic governor (Bill Richardson) with my endorsement for 2008. I will stand by that in future postings, regardless of other postings i post, and regardless of postings posted for my 29 co-members, who range from being a liberal/dem to conservative/rep to in the middle of both parties.


My endorsement, and this does not even have to become the democratic ticket as i will support anyone nonetheless when the time comes of course, for President is Bill Richardson. And Vice President Evan Bayh, on the Democratic Party ticket in 2008.

I will give my endorsement, which is only my humble opinion, of a Republican Party ticket in the coming months, by July 2005.

|

Monday, January 17, 2005

Monday Blog Special 01/17/2005: My 2008 Democratic Ticket Endorsement

My 2008 Democratic Ticket Endorsement

And the winner is.....Bill Richardson (currently US Governor of New Mexico) For President
and........Evan Bayh (currently Us Senator for Indiana.) For Vice President.

I encourage all elgibly participatable readers to listen to my words of encouragement about the Democratic Party right now. There is a sense of obligation that i feel that the Democrats have betrayed the common man by moving too far to the Right. They are too centrist. Their centrism has betrayed the common man as to make it look like Republicans so that people cannot tell the difference between Rightwing Conservatism and Leftwing Liberalism. I hereby pronounce though that Centrism is the only way that this country will ever adhere to a philosophy of unification. However, Centrism must be dont on a Left scale in the democratic party and a Right scale in the Republican Party. Far Left and Far Right extremism isnt anywhere to where we can get in society, however possible. I adhere to my ticket endorsement for 2008 though to a moderate scale of progressive values that will be socially liberal and fiscally conservative centrism to the left. First, I'd like to take a moment to give my condolences to the last two democratic tickets, Gore-Lieberman 2000 and Kerry-Edwards 2004. Gore-Lieberman 2000 won the popular vote, and Kerry-Edwards 2004 lost with the smallest percentage against any reelected incumbent in History of our country. But, Democrats have betrayed the true values of progressivism. We need a ticket that can totally unite the democratic party in 2008. We need a ticket that can totally bring this country together, because believe me after four more years of George W Bush, This country will need to be longing for a change and to be brought back together to the roots of our democracy. We need change. My first heartfelt thanks goes to Al Gore, a man who gave me the hopes and dreams of a life i was in when i was only 17 years old of age in 1996, when he and Clinton ran for reelection and decisively beat the hapless Dole-Kemp ticket on the Republican side. I for one knew from even before the 1996 election, that Al Gore was going to be made the 43rd President of the United States of America. And that he would be able to serve two full terms after Bill Clinton's two full terms (1993-2001) from 2001-2009. And you know what, He was elected just as i had predicted. I saw it straightforward, because the reason that George W Bush occupies the White House right now is because George W Bush is a thief, liar, and the betrayer of democracy and freedom and liberty. George W Bush said he trusted the American People, but when the American People elected Al Gore in 2000 to continue the peace prosperity and progress of the Clinton years, He sued the American People. He sued to have the Supreme Court, with his rightwing poppy followers that had been appointed (or promoted) to the Court by Reagan and his father, to overturn the will of the American People that had elected Al gore, to not fully participate in the democracy of liberty and freedom (and the right to vote was betrayed) by not letting the votes be finished in HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC FLORIDA COUNTIES. Thus, the Coup emerged. The Supreme Court did what they were appointed to do, which was defend the right of state authorities, but when push came to shove, they did the unthinkable, and they abridged states rights to a maximum perspective and overturned the will of the people of Florida and the will of this Nation that had just elected Al Gore the 43rd President of the United Statesof America. Al gore then had no other thing to do then to concede the race to George W Bush, the man who LOST the White House in 2000. The Republicans were jealous of 1960, Watergate, and Bill Clinton. They disgraced this country to the disgrace this country ever imagined. They will be brought down. But here now, I will discuss the future. In 2004, Election maneuvering was done in the wrong way, particularily in Ohio but nationwide. George W Bush stole a second term against the nomination of Howard Dean, who would have otherwise beat him. He used the Media and his Republican Party to manipulate the Democratic Nomination. And by the way , some media it is. Thanks ABC CBS NBC and Fox for siding with the rightwing of this country that we know you really are (lieing liberal media bull is nothing but a pandomonium of lies coming from the Right) and rigging the election in favor of Kerry over Dean, then in favor of Bush over Kerry. Now, i for one will hereby declare an emerging fight, The fight to begin the fight for justice in America, and the right to vote that everyone deserves. Everyone deserves to vote, and have their vote counted. And everyone deserves to do that by paper. Not Machines or Computers. We will make sure that the truth will be brought down for the betrayal of Al Gore and of the Kerry-Edwards ticket. Gore and Lieberman won 2000, and Kerry-Edwards won 2004. I fully declare by where the winner of these elections are Gore and Kerry, and justice will be served someday against the corrupt Republican party and their media minon friends (particularily at ABC CBS NBC and Fox and any newspaper that sides with them.) But for now, I must answer to 2008. 2008 will be justice served for the Democratic and Republican nominations. And i hereby call that even though Al Gore became my hero, that it is far too late for him to return. I hereby give my endorsement to the Governor of New Mexico, Democrat Bill Richardson (born in 1947) for President and the junior us senator from Indiana, Evan Bayh (born in 1955) for Vice President.

The Richardson-Bayh ticket, provided that Bill Richardson surely will get a second term as Governor and immediately launch a presidential campaign bid, will restore civility to this country and begin the process of a long and what will be long, progressive movement in America.

My endorsement, check, for 2008 for President and Vice President of the United States of America, respectively, are as follows - Bill Richardson and Evan Bayh.

|

Sunday, January 16, 2005

Sunday Blog Special 01/16/2005: Abortion On Demand? Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

I am fed up with the Abortion debate in America. Abortion is a rare sensitive issue that doesnt even belong dividing our country apart. Republicans themselves have taken a complete stand against abortion, without clearly identifying the real meaning of contraception. Why is it that every time in America when someone needs to try to talk about the issue of moral complexity, when someone needs to give the real values that meant we should care for the poor, we should help the middle class. we should grow the economy the right way, that there is some kind of effort to undermine the real issues of the great country we call America by making sure that Abortion has to come into the play as an issue. I myself am Pro-choice, and i will admit that. I am prochoice because i believe it is a woman's obligation to do what the hell she damn well pleases with her body. Her body and her body alone must be left alone by the mean old federal government, state governments, or ANY government. Its like this, if you can tolerate the government getting a foot near you for any sake, You could probably use the word fibercate and let the government off of the hook. But no, Government's obligation is to stay the hell out of our homes, and DEFINITELY the hell off of our bodies. I dont think it to be very rational to see to it that Abortion goes out the door one day when it comes to dividing this nation. If a person would want to be a good sport about the Abortion issue, which by the way is a very rare and sensitive issue, you should actually keep a woman's choice all of the way and defend it to the day you die. But there should be somelimitations, like for instance in a pro-life stance you could make sure that Abortion is only able to be limited to the first trimester of pregnancy and half way into the second trimester of pregnancy, whereby by the third trimester of pregnancy you should make it limited to where a woman should give the baby up for Adoption. But you must not, use Abortion like this as a wedge issue to divide this country. This happens to be the United States of America. And you definitely, and this is where i find Republicans to be very insulting. You must not definitely, divide the country on social issues, particularily Abortion , when you cant win on economic issues like supporting the rights of the middle class against the wealthy priviledged elites. The truth is, Republicans need the abortion issue to unite their base. They will NEVER outlaw it. They wont, because if they did it would not be able to unite their base. But thetruth is, you cannot simply do somethinglike this when youcant win on economic issues like supporting the middle class. A fair Abortion platform would be to support both sides of the aisle on this issue by keeping Abortion legal, while restricting it only in the third trimester. Ah Ha! That is already been done with Roe Vs Wade. Thats why we need to protect Roe Vs Wade. More to come later on this from me.....

|

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Veep and Lt Govs (Contd from last posting)

I will dismiss myself right now for Saturday January 15 2005. I will get the list of the Veep and all of the 50 Lieutenant Governors when they can be made available. For now free free to email me at scottieboy19791998@hotmail.com if you would like more about the Lt Gov process in the states. Most states have a Lt Governor that would be the equivilent from the federal level to the Vice President, but that in some or a few states where there is no Lt Governor, The acting presiding officer usually is the highest member in ranking of the majority party of the State Senate of that state. That is the end of my blog for the debut day of Saturday January 15 2005. From this point on, my blog will instantly become transformed into a news site that will give news updates from across the country and across the globe. I will be looking forward to any of your comments, suggestions or requests at my email if any need be aroused. feel free, and take good care for now :).

Wishing the best,
New Blogger fpotusahuss20321979 Scot

|

Pres, Veep, Govs, and Lt Govs

President Of The United States: George W Bush (Republican) elected 2000, 2004.

Midwest 13 Governors:
IL - Rod Blagojevich (Democratic) elected 2002. (illinois)
IA - Tom Vilsack (Democratic) elected 1998, 2002. (iowa)
MO - Matt Blunt (Republican) elected 2004. (missouri)
IN - Mitch Daniels (Republican) elected 2004. (indiana)
KY - Ernie Fletcher (Republican) elected 2003. (kentucky)
WI - Jim Doyle (Democratic) elected 2002. (wisconsin)
MI - Jennifer Granholm (Democratic) elected 2002. (michigan)
MN - Tim Pawlenty (Republican) elected 2002. (minnesota)
OH - Bob Taft II (Republican) elected 1998, 2002. (ohio)
KS - Kathleen Sebelius (Democratic) elected 2002. (kansas)
NE - Dave Heineman (Republican) succeeded 2004-2005. (nebraska)
SD - Mike Rounds (Republican) elected 2002. (south dakota)
ND - John Hoeven (Republican) elected 2000, 2004. (north dakota)

Southeast 13 Governors:
FL - Jeb Bush (Republican) elected 1998, 2002. (florida)
LA - Kathleen B Blanco (Democratic) elected 2003. (louisiana)
AR - Mike Huckabee (Republican) succeeded 1996, elected 1998, 2002. (arkansas)
MS - Haley Barbour (Republican) elected 2003. (mississippi)
AL - Bob Riley (Republican) elected 2002. (alabama)
GA - G Sonny Perdue (Republican) elected 2002. (georgia)
TN - Phil Bredesen (Democratic) elected 2002. (tennessee)
SC - Mark Sanford (Republican) elected 2002. (south carolina)
NC - Mike Easley (Democratic) elected 2000, 2004. (north carolina)
VA - Mark Warner (Democratic) elected 2001. (virginia)
WV - Joe Manchin III (Democratic) elected 2004. (west virginia)
MD - Bob Ehrlich Jr (Republican) elected 2002. (maryland)
DE - Ruth Ann Minner (Democratic) elected 2000, 2004. (delaware)

Northeast (the first 9 listed here) and Southwest (the last 4 listed here) 13 Governors:
PA - Edward Rendell (Democratic) elected 2002. (pennsylvania)
NJ - Acting Governor Richard Codey (Democratic) succeeded 2004. (new jersey)
NY - George Pataki (Republican) elected 1994, 1998, 2002. (new york)
CT - M Jodi Rell (Republican) succeeded 2004. (connecticut)
RI - Don Carcieri (Republican) elected 2002. (rhode island)
MA - Mitt Romney (Republican) elected 2002. (massachusetts)
VT - Jim Douglas (Republican) elected 2002, 2004. (vermont) has 2 year terms instead of 4.
NH - John Lynch (Democratic) elected 2004. (new hampshire) has 2 year terms instead of 4.
ME - John Baldacci (Democratic) elected 2002. (maine)
TX - Rick Perry (Republican) succeeded 2000-2001, elected 2002. (texas)
OK - Brad Henry (Democratic) elected 2002. (oklahoma)
NM - Bill Richardson (Democratic) elected 2002. (new mexico)
AZ - Janet Napolitano (Democratic) elected 2002. (arizona)

Mountain West (first 6 states), Far West (next proceeding three states), Pacific Ocean West (next proceeding after that two states), and Atlantic Ocean East (last 2 that are not currently states but that i support to become the 51st and 52nd states.):
CO - Bill Owens (Republican) elected 1998, 2002. (colorado)
WY - Dave Freudenthal (Democratic) elected 2002. (wyoming)
MT - Brian Schweitzer (Democratic) elected 2004. (montana)
UT - Jon Huntsman Jr (Republican) elected 2004. (utah)
ID - Dirk Kempthorne (Republican) elected 1998, 2002. (idaho)
NV - Kenny Guinn (Republican) elected 1998, 2002. (nevada)
CA - Arnold Schwarzenegger (Republican) *elected in recall election to recall Gray Davis (Democratic) from office who was elected in 1998 and reelected in 2002. elected 2003. (california)
OR - Ted Kulongoski (Democratic) elected 2002. (oregon)
WA - Christine Gregoire (Democratic) elected 2004. (washington state)
AK - Frank Murkowski (Republican) elected 2002. (alaska)
HI - Linda Lingle (Republican) elected 2002. (hawaii)
DC - Mayor Anthony Williams (Democratic) elected 1998, 2002. (washington, dc, or the future state of what i would like to portend to be called Washington Columbia, or New Columbia for the sake of the Reverend Al Sharpton.)
PR - Governor Anibal Acevedo-Vila (PPD = Popular Democratic Party) elected 2004. (Puerto Rico)

***DC and PR deserve to become the 51st and 52nd states of America in my humble opinion. The citizens of those great states , or what should become states, have earned their right and their priviledged to be voted into the Union of the Great United States of America. Write to your local representative or senator and tell them today, that if you agree to make DC and PR states, numbers 51 and 52, to enlarge our union and welcome the Black and Hispanic Heritages to the great Usa (as i do and fully support) then write and tell them regardless if they are a Democrat or a Republican that if they do not vote to make DC or PR give the full legal status of the Usa, You will VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE and PUT SOMEONE NEW IN THAT WILL. the people of Puerto Rico pay taxes that are somewhat equivilent of the mainland, but not totally 100% like the people of DC, who have earned their right since 1789. Puerto Rico and Washington Dc needs to become the 51st and 52nd state, in no matter order, immediately. TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION is tyranny, so tell your people that the residents of DC and Pr that are paying taxes either that are the same as the mainland (DC) or equivilent to the mainland (PR) that they need to either be added to the Union or they need to quit paying Taxes. It is our duty today to step up as a one peoples to say that this must end. They must be made full 100% states and must give the residents of DC and PR a voice in the United States Congress and the United States Senate that matters to the people living under them.`

|

Saturday Blog Debut 01/15/2005: Saturday January 15 2005 Blog Debut

Today is Saturday January 15 2005: My Blog debuts online. The blog address, http://news88.blogspot.com and to introduce you to myself. I am 25/male/IL Usa. I am currently turning 26 in February. This blog will be a blog for news about anything you wish to type about into it, but all or most of the posts will be by me for the sake of an internet department office of 30 members that i run out of an apartment complex where i live in IL, Usa.

Enjoy. And for future reference, I myself will bio myself in the coming days. So check back soon. For now i leave you with my 30 members in my introductory note blog post here where i will help you identify them (only by online identity names.):
1. Scot aka fpotusahuss20321979, mister1979 (Owner of this Blog and Group 1 Leader of the apartment complex's internet department office internet member only computer lab.
2. Steven aka thedippersteven1967 (group 1 member)
3. Mary aka mary1982 (group 1 member)
4. Monica aka monica1979 (group 1 member)

5. Jennifer aka fflotusahuss20321982, mistress1982 (Group 2 Leader)
6. Stacy aka stacythegoddess1979 (group 2 member)
7. Annette aka annette1990 (group 2 member)
8. Craig aka craig1982 (group 2 member)

9. John aka john1964 (Group 3 Leader)
10. Katherine aka katherine1968 (group 3 member)
11. Janet aka mampbajwifey1977 (group 3 member)
12. Lawrence aka hubbymampbaj1970 (group 3 member)
13. Travis aka travis1988 (group 3 member)

14. Charlene aka charlene1973 (Group 4 Leader #1)
15. Darlene aka darlene1980 (Group 4 Leader #2)
16. Maria aka mariathemanizer1970 (group 4 member)
17. Thomas aka thomas1976 (group 4 member)
18. Robert aka robert1969 (group 4 member)
19. Joshua aka joshua1977 (group 4 member)

20. Chris aka chrisrockfanchris1983 (Group 5 Leader)
21. Larry aka falseteeth1946 (group 5 member)
22. Randall aka powersunshine1956 (group 5 member)
23. Gary aka gary1984 (group 5 member)
24. Annabelle aka annabelle1983 (group 5 member)

25. Lindsay aka skatergirllindsay1986 (Group 6 Leader)
26. Mike aka invisiblesheep1965 (group 6 member)
27. Sheila aka visiblesheep1971 (group 6 member)
28. Brandy aka brandy1977 (group 6 member)
29. Rachel aka rachel1987 (group 6 member)
30. Justin aka justin1986 (group 6 member)

Those are the 30 members of my internet department office, who will be guest featurers when i publish my news articles and such of the day as well as other things, et. al. etc online here at this address. But remember, this is my blog not theirs, but they will be guest features. I will keep you posted further to see how things work out.

Also, I may also let two, actually three, people in addition post short features to me to this site and that is allensue (aka allen and sue) and M25RV (aka Mike.) But Mike and allensue are my online friends. One lives in another town in IL separate from my apartment complex town, and the other , the latter m25rv, lives in Michigan Usa. They will offer their postings to me by email, and ill publish theirs here for them.

|
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com
Free Web poll for your Web site - freepolls.com
Free Web poll for your Web site - freepolls.com